By Chuck Abbott
Americans declare beef is better than its plant-based or lab-grown alternatives from almost any standpoint, from taste to nutrition and environmental impact, said a Purdue University report on Wednesday.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38eb7/38eb76ed2ca4d9383a429bacab5ff90984d1c2aa" alt="Whatever you call it, cultivated meat trails beef in consumers’ estimation consumers"
Americans declare beef is better than its plant-based or lab-grown alternatives from almost any standpoint, from taste to nutrition and environmental impact, said a Purdue University report on Wednesday. Consumers gave slightly higher scores to “lab-grown meat” as opposed to “cell-cultured meat,” although it is the same thing.
Beef dominated the “which is better” responses from 1,200 consumers in the Purdue survey on 17 attributes, usually scoring more than 50%, and in the low 70s in a few instances, while an alternative protein got 25% or less. A quarter of respondents typically rated beef and the alternative as “about the same.”
“The biggest take-away from our alternative meat questions is that consumers still overwhelmingly prefer beef from cattle across a wide range of product attributes,” said Joseph Balagtas, the lead author of the Consumer Food Insights report, produced monthly. “And while cell-cultured meat has not yet hit the market, our study highlights that marketing — and in particular the naming of a new product or technology – can influence consumer perceptions of the product.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90a87/90a871c869a1d4cb549152032462a1ffeff10424" alt="Whatever you call it, cultivated meat trails beef in consumers’ estimation Whatever you call it, cultivated meat trails beef in consumers’ estimation VegNews.AlephFarmsSteak"
Cell-cultured meat emerged a few years ago as consensus name for meat produced indoors by putting cells and a growth medium into a fermentation vat. It was superseded recently by “cultivated meat” as the industry’s preferred name.
Purdue tested “lab-grown meat” and “cell-cultured meat” in its survey and found consumers gave higher scores when lab-grown was the adjective. On environmental impact, for instance, 27% of participants said lab-grown meat was better than beef, compared to 22% for cell-cultured meat. For most attributes, the difference was a couple of percentage points in favor of lab-grown meat, although beef scored vastly higher against the rival products.
“Animal welfare is the only dimension on which consumers rated an alternative (i.e., plant-based) as better than regular beef,” said the report. Some 42% said plant-based substitutes were better, compared to 38% for beef.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04888/04888eb8b59b6511547bb6fdfead9ae5052f33c4" alt="Whatever you call it, cultivated meat trails beef in consumers’ estimation Whatever you call it, cultivated meat trails beef in consumers’ estimation l intro 1653591637"
** Click here to read the full-text **